Forum
Let's face it, she's hardly an artist that is going to be prioritised for an update, given how relatively little she will have added in those 4 years. Her last album didn't exactly set the world on fire and her streaming numbers, while not exactly terrible are from amazing either.
Her Streaming numbers are quite similar to Britney's total, she had an update 3 years after her last album in 2019. Chartmasters have ads and are now charging for the spotify tool, they are making money, surely as a business you would have up to date (ish) data what is the point in having 4 year old data??? it's ridiculous and this isn't just for Christina.
Putting Mi Reflejo songs on an "orphan" album makes no sense at all. Mi Reflejo is Christina's second studio album. If you want to separate the Spanish versions of the songs from her debut album, ok. But there are original songs on Mi Reflejo, which deserve to be treated like the other songs on any standard album, not as an "orphan" album because they're not. Mi Reflejo exists, is a studio album, and deserves to be treated equally as the other standard albums.
Hey I have a question about her current streaming numbers. I used the spotify search tool and her current total is 4.92B streams, with features accounting for 1.37B of it. However on the "Most streamed artists ever on Spotify" list you have, her features are listed as 2.06B, and her total streams is 5.8B. Which is correct?
Also, the 90M version of "Say Something" appears on her search although she does not sing on that version so I believe that's an error.
Hi Kris!
If a song appears on her search it's because Spotify puts her among credited artists, so she is actually paid for that ^^
About her totals, the ones you search are correct, it seems Moves Like Jagger was duplicated on the last saved search, I removed the bogus data!
the only reason Britney was updated is because she reached the 100m milestone, something Christina will never reach
We need to be realistic here. This is a small business not a billion dollar organisations. They are not billboard or nielsen soundscan that have hundreds of if not thousands of employees that can update sales regularly, even Soundscan hasnt updated/published many of Aguilera's sales for decades. I dont know if u r a paying customer or not. But if u r, u can always stop making payment and find other services that satisfy your needs.
It's no use, if xtina released more albums, she would saturate even more and maybe arrive in 2006 selling even less, Britney had a magnetism, charisma and powerful clips and hits that made her last for a long 15 years, her argument is not valid.
tell the truth!
Britney and Xtina are far apart on spotify
from january to august 2021 Britney made 1 billion streams on spotify, Aguilera made 610kk with the help of powerful ft and considering that Britney hasn't released anything in 5 years!
the achievements as an artist on stage and in audiovisual productions influence sales, Xtina didn't deliver clips as good as Britney, didn't deliver iconic performances like Britney, wasn't even 1/3 charismatic like Britney, had no visual influence like Britney he had..
You need to update this, please!
At the end of the day, Christina's career is the career any artist would want: having almost complete artistic control while signed onto a mainstream record label.
Although this approach does not always favor sales, she could have retired after Back to Basics and been set for life and generations after, so I don't understand her detractors.
There were only two things that could've prevented her sudden decline in sales and popularity: either release Bionic earlier or continue building on the image that she created with Back to Basics. Bionic alienated old fans and radio began to favor the new acts at the time of its release, so there was little room for a new generation of fans to emerge. Bionic's flop really had little to do with the content itself, it was more so the timing and press.
I also think she could've utilized the markets more during her peak. If she had popped out albums year after year, she would've been close to 90-100M units in album sales, and not ~55M. For example, she could've released a 2.0 of her pop debut, a 2.0 of Stripped, or continued to release more Spanish albums instead. Nonetheless, I still think she can find success in other markets such as the Spanish market. Her last album even went #1 in Spain.
What is it with people coming on here and telling the site and it's contributors that it/they, need to update their favourite artist!
It pisses me off, the amount of people whose sole contribution is, indignantly stating that their favourite artist needs to updated and then reeling of some cringeworthy and biased reasons why!
I also find it startling that so many fans of female solo acts seem to be marketing and management geniuses, who know exactly how their favourite artists career should have been promoted, marketed and managed!
It's never the case that the public have just gone off an act and their music or their music has gone downhill, oh no, it's always down to bad promo and marketing!
When will you finally update her stats from other streaming platforms other than Spotify? Lotus - 179,000 - this is data from Spotify only. Your Body has over 200m views on YouTube, which is 20k sps (using your method). Where is Mi Reflejo (STUDIO ALBUM)?Why this album is in "ORPHAN"? Combine these albums into one like you did with TF + TFM because you count Genie Atrapado streams for Christina Aguilera (album).
you're trying everything you can to make her look bigger than what she really is. give it up. LOL
Stripped not selling 10M pure sales is what I'd call disappointing, Back To Basics moving only 6.5M units is simply tragic. Aguilera only lasted for 4 years.
What an exaggeration! Back to Basics is a double CD, and in most countries it costs more, which puts off casual shoppers - not fans, of course. The three Back to Basics singles have earned gold and platinum certifications in the US and other countries, nowhere near a failure. The sound of the record is not as catchy and mainstream as what was playing at the time. In comparison, Madonna released in 1990 the CD I'm Brathless, with the same type of sound and which sold about 6 million copies worldwide, even with a (catchy) song like Vogue - which differs from the whole album - as a single.
Maybe she is not that BIGGER but she has amazing and better sales worldwide... Those sales are not updated and there is still one album (Liberation) and others singles that must be updated to the current year.
I'd like to see this article updated as well, but since Christina is in the middle of putting out new music, it might actually be better to wait another year until that's all been released so it's included in the update.
Hey MJD, could you please add Liberation at least to the CSPC table? I have seen other artists being updated with their latest releases, but not Christina. If you have the time we would love to see the pure sales breakdown of the album too. Thank you, much appreciated.
She didn't even last longer than katy. Horrible stats for someone to be known as rival of Britney back then.
That is what happens when someone copies when they can't come up with their own thing.
