Music Industry, an infinite Journey:
Part III – The Future

Streaming alternatives? Paranoid Android

By covering all eras we noticed how every format ended dying after shining brightly. Will streaming suffer the same fate?

Many people though dropping sales were due to illegal downloading. The real reason was actually the same as in every other era: sales dropped because related music player disappeared.

At cassettes arrival, turntables sales went down as they were more expensive than cassette players. Time for population to switch of record player and cassettes sales ended by topping vinyl sales. From mid-80s, public started to move on CD players, downgrading cassettes players. They still survived until late in the 90s because of old cars mostly having cassette players.

When cars moved to CD players, sales of cassettes completely disappeared. Then, personal computer got into everyone house and CD sales boomed when they started to include CD player. At the same point, Hi-Fi stereo got irrelevant, which pushed sales down in the mid-run.

Not only Hi-Fi systems disappeared, in early 2010s so did CD players from computers. The likes Notebooks, Ultrabooks etc do not have CD slots anymore. Vehicles too moved from CD to MP3 players. While most people had their eyes on illegal downloads, few noted the CD music players was dead, and then, it was only a matter of time before the CD album to be dead as well.

Whatever happens, we have to deal with digital. At that point, you can select either downloads or streaming, but has we saw, there is no match between both models.

Streaming is the definitive answer to the music industry. We can listen to everything, everywhere, at every moment. Just like it seems unacceptable to pay for each and every phone call or text, same will be true for music. The public want an unlimited subscription. Welcome to Spotify, Apple Music, Deezer, Google Play, Youtube Music and others!

More than ever, feel free to comment and / or ask a question.

5 thoughts on “Music Industry, an infinite Journey:
Part III – The Future”

  1. This is another fascinating article, quite long and detailed, with plenty of numbers, as I like.

    There are way so many things to comment, but one of them is about record companies. You are projecting the whole music industry (mostly thanks to streaming) will easily top the earnings achieved in 1999, record year. The question is, are record companies prepared for this sort of tsunami? Do they understand what it is going on right now? It seems you have been able to grasp this, but, overall, most people (both consumers and probably majors’ executives) don’t fully comprehend this phenomenom. It is like some of these things are passing unnoticed by most chart watchers and experts; most of them tend to be conservative and impugn Spotify and similar social services.

    In other words, what I’m asking is: how will promotion work once the streaming/subscription system is totally developed to stay? Traditional promotion may not work in this new stage. And I guess this new technology, far more democratic, may open room for smaller record companies.

    1. Hello Hernan! Indeed, this will be a real tsunami for the industry. Most of the industry is aware of how much profit they can make in the future, which explains why all there have been several strong movements to get a bigger share of this new pie lately. I expect years 2016-2018 to be marked by a ferocious war between all actors to take the lead and end on a powerful position to negociate as good as possible.
      I do not expect promotional campaigns to vary much yet as they are impacted by numerous external factors – radio programs, TV programs etc. The main difference should be that artists should get a higher profile promotion overall, just like it was the case in the 90s. B-League worldwide acts will be strongly promoted, A-League acts will have air-time on largest channels etc. unlike recent years that saw most acts be promoted only on local / network channels.

  2. Plus, you have also thrown another vital factor, not studied either up until now: the role of China in the future music industry.

    As the years go by, technology gets cheaper and thus more people across the globe has access to it. Smartphones are more “democratic” than the already old music players, so the market for music is potentially bigger than it ever was. This means more people in developing countries are starting to consume music in a way that was probably impossible some years ago.

    But China is a different story. Their music market is getting bigger not only because of technology but because of the country’s level of growth.

    I’m rasing this issue because, over the past 15 years, China has produced a huge impact on both the food and agricultural market. They eat more and better than in the past (adding basically pork and chicken to their diet), elevating the price of soybean, wheat, corn and meat (plus many fruits and beverages, like wine). Can they “distort” the music market like they did with food, for instance?

    Now not only are they eating better, but they are starting to consume music like in the Western world. Of course, USA, Europe or Australia will be consuming more music per capita than China, but China will have a role it has never had before.

    Perhaps China deserves a separate essay, don’t you think? The consequences (I’m not saying “consequencies” in a bad way, of course) of China finally entering the music industry haven’t been analysed yet. And it would also be interesting to know: which Western acts are popular there?

    1. Hello again Hernan! Indeed, demographics will change big time in upcoming years. In the 50s/60s, the world music industry was massively oriented towards English-speaking countries. In the 70s/80s, developped countries got included in the discussion – France, Germany, Japan & such. During the 90s, even small / isolated countries got a decent music market like most Asian countries, Brazil etc. During recent years, this phenomenon stopped with the map even coming back to the 70s situation – we can see how Adele’s 21 sold almost 19m copies out of 29 in North America, UK and Australia alone. The reason is that music industry isn’t profitable enough to develop local business, thus majors closed their offices in smallest countries (music sales wise).

      Streaming, as you mention, is incredibly democratic as Mexico or Brazil for example end up being as big or even bigger than France or Germany.

      China will be a tremendous actor in upcoming years. In movies industry for example, the 1999-2005 Star Wars trilogy grossed less than $20 million there. The new album is over $120 million alone by now. Fast & Furious 7 grossed more in China ($391m) than in the US ($353). The once irrelevant market is expected to become the biggest in the world as early as in 2017. Situation will be no different in the music industry with streaming arrival. In a few years only one may expect China results to top even the US music industry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *